Which leadership style is not identified by Kurt Lewin?

Which leadership style is not identified by Kurt Lewin?

• A. Democratic
• B. Autocratic
• C. Laissez Faire
• D. Abdicratic

Answer: (D)

The leadership styles identified by Kurt Lewin include democratic, autocratic, and laissez-faire. Each of these styles reflects different approaches to decision-making and the delegation of authority. Democratic leadership involves group participation in decision-making, fostering a collaborative environment. Autocratic leadership, on the other hand, is characterized by a high level of control with the leader making decisions unilaterally. Laissez-faire leadership offers a hands-off approach, allowing team members to work independently while the leader provides minimal guidance. Abdicratic is not a recognized leadership style within Lewin's framework. This term does not fit into the established typology of leadership styles that Lewin proposed, making it the correct answer in this context. Understanding Lewin's original concepts can aid in recognizing various leadership strategies and their implications in organizational settings.

The leadership styles identified by Kurt Lewin include democratic, autocratic, and laissez-faire. Each of these styles reflects different approaches to decision-making and the delegation of authority.

Democratic leadership involves group participation in decision-making, fostering a collaborative environment. Autocratic leadership, on the other hand, is characterized by a high level of control with the leader making decisions unilaterally. Laissez-faire leadership offers a hands-off approach, allowing team members to work independently while the leader provides minimal guidance.

Abdicratic is not a recognized leadership style within Lewin's framework. This term does not fit into the established typology of leadership styles that Lewin proposed, making it the correct answer in this context. Understanding Lewin's original concepts can aid in recognizing various leadership strategies and their implications in organizational settings.